Posts Tagged ‘Portland’

Notes on Nik Silver Efex Pro 2: Introduction

I’ve decided to make up some notes for myself on the new version of Nik Silver Efex Pro.  I’m posting them here so that I can access them anywhere – and so, obviously, can you.  Feel free to send corrections, opinions, et al.

The reference image for these notes will be the shot of a Camellia bush shown above.  The image was recorded at Cathedral Park in Portland, OR, at about noon on February 20, 2011, using the Nikon D3s and the most excellent AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR lens at 165mm.  Exposure was f/11 and 1/40s, ISO at 200.

Processing on the color version of the Camellia included white balance adjustment based on the WhiBal reference card (see the February 25 entry for a shot of the HP holding same), highlight recover in the RAW conversion (+13), and curves adjustments of the red and green channels followed by conversion of that layer to Luminosity blending mode.  Capture sharpening, midtone contrast enhancement, and output sharpening (for web) were applied using PhotoKit Sharpener 2.0 (the new version of PhotoKit Sharpener is really very good).  The upper of the two large flowers near the center is pretty high key, and although I could have normalized the brightness, I deliberately left it bright since that the way I saw it.

The version of the image that we will use for a workup in Silver Efex Pro 2, see below, is a minimalist version of the image above, which leaves out the curves adjustment and the midtone contrast enhancement, but adds a Hue/Saturation adjustment to boost the color saturation (+25 on the Master control) prior to BW conversion.

I start Silver Efex Pro 2 using the Nik Selective Tool, and by default the image is rendered using the Neutral Preset as shown below – click on the image to see a larger size version (opens in new window/tab).

Click on the image to see a larger size version

The default conversion (Neutral) actually looks pretty promising right from the start as shown below.

Typically, the first adjustments made to a converted image should involve tonal adjustments, e.g., brightness and contrast.  The Tone Control set from the original Silver Efex Pro, hereafter SEP, included Brightness, Contrast, and Structure controls, and semi-hidden in the Film Type section, a Tone Curve adjustment tool.  The Brightness and Contrast controls function in ways that will be familiar to anyone who has conducted even basic photo processing.  The Structure control was never been well-documented by the official Nik SEP software manual, which only suggests that the control emphasizes or deemphasizes ‘fine details throughout the image’.  According to the Lesson Site for SEP2, Structure control applies some sort of microcontrast enhancement that is restricted to areas within tonal regions, and that specifically avoids contrast adjustments at tonal interfaces (edges.)  This  remains unnecessarily cryptic in my book.  The effect is similar in some respects to the sort of enhancement one gets by applying a Photoshop Unsharp Mask contrast enhancement with values like 20, 50, and 0, respectively, for Amount, Radius, and Threshold.  Regardless, the ability to control contrast in this way in real-time is very powerful.

In Silver Efex Pro 2, hereafter, SEP2, the Brightness, Contrast, and Structure controls have been expanded to included parametric controls, which significantly expands the ability to fine tune the influence of the tone controls.  In the new feature set then, one can isolate adjustments, for example, to only the Highlights, leaving the midtone and shadows regions unaffected.

The parametric controls will be familiar to anyone who has used the ACR Tone Curve tool shown below.

In the next entry, I’ll review the Brightness tone controls in detail.

Copyright 2011 Peter F. Flynn. No usage permitted without prior written consent. All rights reserved.

 

Macy’s Holiday Parade – PDX – 2010 Edition

We are back at the PDX-edition of the Macy’s Holiday Parade.  My niece, Jennifer (shown above), is a killer sax player, and her band is a regular participant in the parade.  This gives me a good excuse to work in an area that I would never otherwise cover.  I don’t believe that anyone would imagine that photographing a parade would be easy, but let me just confirm that it is an extremely challenging proposition.

The main challenge of course is to get the shot right the first time – chances are that you will not get a second attempt.  This requires that you know you can properly diagnose the light, know your gear, and that you can get a wide range of shots with a minimal lens complement.  In many ways it’s the same challenge faced by any outdoor nature photographer.  If you’ve ever tried to shoot a black bear on the move or bird landing or flying off you know what I’m talking about.

Here’s a practical consideration that might be a bit under-appreciated…  Given that parades are linear entities, there are just two aspects from which to shoot them from: the left side or the right side.  How do you choose?  Of course there may be obvious advantages/disadvantages to a particular perspective, which dictate which side you choose, but often as not it’s going to be arbitrary.  For me it is easy, which side is my niece the killer sax player closest to?

Those of you who know PDX will appreciate that the street layout downtown is dominated by long boulevards that run north-south.  This geography dictates the course of the parade and means that you end up standing on either the west side; as I did last year, or on the east side as I did for this event.  Don’t even think about going back and forth – you will end up with nothing.

The light that morning was harsh, and I deliberately left a few shots – like the ones above of the Holiday King and Queen and the Llama handler – in the natural high-key lighting that was present.  Although I think that the high-key thing is overdone in many instances, I believe that these shots work pretty well.

For color and contrast, what can beat a clown outfit?  Answer = nothing!

Images in this gallery were recorded between about 08:45 and 09:45 (PST) on November 26, 2010, using the Nikon D3s and the AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED V RII lens.  Overcast sky with periodic sunbreaks led to exposures in the range of f/8 and 1/400s to 1/1000s.  ISO between 3200 and 6400 – once again, I am pretty confident that there is simply no better camera under these conditions that the D3s.

Copyright 2010 Peter F. Flynn. No usage permitted without prior written consent. All rights reserved.