Archive for the ‘Adventure’ Category

The Myth of the Golden Hour, Part III

In Part II in the series we discussed an overlay method that improves definition in the highlight areas of the image.  Part II was published on January 22, and Part I was published on January 13.  In this installment, we will consider a method for enhancing contrast by application of a curves adjustment layer.  Our working image is shown below.

Currently, we have three layers: the top layer is a copy of the original unprocessed copy of the image in darken mode, a middle layer  overlay layer, and the original image on the bottom.  Let’s flatten the layer by opening the Layers submenu (click the downward point arrow in the upper right hand corner of the Layers tab) and selecting the Flatten option.

Then copy the resulting Background layer to generate a new Background copy layer.

A curious condition of RGB images is that the contribution of the red, green, and blue channels to the luminosity (contrast) present is not equal.  We will leave a technical discussion for why this is so for a future entry, but in fact the green channel is most important, followed the red channel and then the blue channel in the ratio 6:3:1.  This suggests that we could delete the blue channel and retain 90% of the current image contrast – it’s true!

To review the contribution of the individual channels we open the Channels menu, select Window on the Photoshop top menu bar, and then select the Channels item from the drop down menu.

By selecting the individual Red, Green, and Blue channels in the CHANNELS tab in turn, we can see what each of these elements brings to the overall image – note that when a channel is selected, the channel indicator turns blue ( assuming default Photoshop behavior).

Select the red channel panel to activate only that channel.

Select the green channel panel to activate the green channel only.

Finally, select the blue channel panel to activate the blue channel.

Careful review of the individual channels confirms that they are all about equal in terms of providing elements of contrast to the image.  This will not always be the case, especially in images recorded in red rock country.  In this case, the most straightforward approach to improving contrast will be to apply curves adjustment to the individual red and green channels (the blue channel may be adjusted, but in practical terms, such adjustments have minimal impact).

Begin by conducting a merge-copy by typing <cntl><shft>alt>e (<cmd><shft>alt>e on the Mac)  This merges the current three layers into one layer, and then copies that layer on top of the others.  We could have simply flatten the three layers and then copied the result, however the merge-copy gives us a bit of additional flexibility, e.g., we could always delete the merge-copy layer and then rework the darken or overlay layers.

So that we can remember how all the current layers were generated, let’s rename them by selecting (double-click) the text in the LAYERS tab.

We now load the red channel by selecting that channel in the CHANNELS tab, and then apply a curve to the channel by typing <cntl>m (<cmd>m on the Mac).

Notice that I have steepened the curve near the maximum on the right hand side of the histogram (note that I have rendered the histogram so that it displays the amount of light – this is the default setting, however I usually rig it to show % pigment/ink).  The right side of the histogram is where the luminosity of the lighter rock surfaces is represented, and steepening the curve in this region increases contrast in the rocks.

We apply a curves adjustment to the green channel to further enhance the contrast in the rocks.

Since we are working in RGB color space, luminosity and color are intrinsically tied together.  Thus the curves we have applied to the red and green channels generate not only a change in luminosity (contrast in the BW sense), but also a color shift.  We can fix this easily by simply changing the blending mode of the Merged-copy Layer to luminosity to produce the contrast-enhanced (only) image shown below.

Compare this image (above) to the one we started with in this entry (below).

Next, we merge-copy to generate a new layer on top, and change the blending mode of the new layer to multiply.

Finally we adjust the opacity to until things agree with our vision of the place, about 60%, to finish up this lesson.

This was a long discussion, perhaps too long for most.  Anyway, I hope you find it useful.  Send questions if you got ’em.  There is a quote by Edward Weston that I favor: “Photography to the amateur is recreation, to the professional it is work, and hard work too, no matter how pleasurable it may be”.

Copyright 2010 Peter F. Flynn. No usage permitted without prior written consent. All rights reserved.

The Myth of Golden Hour, Part II

The image we will consider in this entry is the often-photographed Horseshoe Bend site near Page, AZ.  The overlook is located about 6 miles south of Page on US 89, at the end of a 0.75 mile hike (one-way) over rolling sandy terrain.  The final processed image is shown below.

The source image (shown below) was was recorded on July 22, 2009, at about 14:40 MST, using the Nikon D700 and the AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED lens at 27mm.  Exposure was f/16 and 1/125s, ISO 200.  Minimal processing of the RAW image was conducted during the conversion.

The image exhibits the anticipated washed-out attributes that we would anticipate given the time of day at which the image was recorded.  In this instance, as we so often find, photographing this amazing scene during the Golden Hour is simply not tractable, since long shadows would fill the canyon, generating an uninteresting image.  Our only option is to record the image when the sun is relatively close to its zenith, and hope to enhance detail and color post-capture.

Below, I include a screen capture of the ACR Raw conversion interface below to illustrate that although the image it pretty washed out, the histogram indicates that things aren’t too bad – this is common is images recorded near midday on sunny days.

There are several things would should like to improve.  The clouds on the horizon are attractive, but a bit blown out.  There is dramatic color variation, but it definitely could be much better.  Specifically, both contrast (luminosity) and color variation would be improved by both darkening the sandstone surfaces throughout the image and by expanding the subtle range of color present.

We’ll tackle the clouds/sky issue first.  We begin by copying the Background layer to generate the Background copy layer.

The next move is difficult to motivate, but the results are compelling.  Apply the blue channel of the RGB image to the R,G, and B channels in Normal blending mode – select  Image > Apply Image…   Note that the Invert box is checked – this is important.  See the dialog box and resulting image below.

Not yet clear where this is headed?  Try changing the blending mode of the Background copy layer from Normal to Overlay blending mode as shown below.

Although you may be able to see that we have increased definition in the clouds, the image still looks pretty strange., and specifically there is an odd loss of resolution throughout most of the image  We clear this up by blurring the Background copy Layer.  Make certain that the Background copy layer is selected (the layer icon will turn blue if you are using default settings).  Then select  Filter > Blur > Gaussian Blur…  The Gaussian Blur dialog box will appear, and allow you to vary the radius parameter.

The proper setting of radius depends on the resolution of the image.   As you increase radius, the image will gain back the original resolution of the source image, but the clouds – and – other highlight regions of the image – will have improved definition.  For this 12MP image, I had to apply the maximum value, 250 pixels, twice.  The Photoshop engineers definitely need to increased the range of the radius parameter to accommodate current and future image sizes.  The resulting image is shown below.

Careful comparison between the working image shown above and the original image indicates that the Overlay procedure has left the image much lighter.  We restore the original luminosity by first copying the Background image to generate a new layer named Background copy 2, and then draging that new layer to the top of the layers stack as shown below.

Of course, since the blending mode of the new layer is Normal, the view you now have of the image is exactly the same as when you started – placing any image with blending mode set to Normal  at the top of a layer stack simply displays that image.  Things get interesting when you convert the blending mode to Darken as shown below.

The influence of the processing becomes clear when we view a section of the sky as shown below – original image on the upper half.

Note that not only has the definition in the clouds improved, but the canyon walls have also been enhanced.  This is a good stopping point for the current entry.  Stay tuned for part III.

One final note.  I didn’t invent any of the methods discussed in this entry.  My approach is a combination of a wide range of influences, including ideas discussed by Martin Evening, Bruce Fraser, Scott Kelby, Dan Margulis, Deke McClelland, Jeff Schewe, Rov Sheppard, and a number of others – all of the folks listed by name publish excellent texts on image processing and are well worth owning.

An image of the Horseshoe Bend area is shown below courtesy of Google Earth Imaging.

Copyright 2010 Peter F. Flynn. No usage permitted without prior written consent. All rights reserved.

Midwinter at Farmington Bay

Snow on the ground…fog in the air (or is it still that inversion)…Farmington Bay is a starkly beautiful place this time of year.  The proper name of the area is the Farmington Bay Waterfowl Management Area, and it is administered through the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources.  The WMA is located about 25 miles north of Salt Lake City, UT, just a couple of miles off of I15, and just outside the city of Centerville.

The image above, of a Bald Eagle resting on a snag, was recorded on January 17, 2010 at about 13:00 MDT.  This eagle did not move from its roost during the three or so hours that we were in the WMA.  The eagles winter here, but don’t expect to see them flying around too much.  Apparently this loafing behavior is part of their effort to conserve energy.

The eagle image was captured using the Nikon D3s and the AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 200-400mm f/4G IF-ED lens at 240mm.  Exposure was f/8 and 1/1250s, ISO 200.  Image converted to BW using Nik Silver Efex Pro.  The NIKKOR 200-400mm is the newest hardware acquisition, and was on test for the first time today.  All of the images recorded for this entry were recorded with the D3s/200-400mm setup.

We saw several Great Blue Herons (the one above scarcely visible).  Curiously, all but one of these were hunting, e.g., doing that stealth walk thing they do, not in the water, but on the snow covered marsh.  Although I had normally thought of Herons as dining exclusively on fish (or water bugs and such), apparently they will go after small terrestrial critters when the situation calls for it.  The image above was recorded at 13:43 MDT.

American Kestrels are among my favorite birds – not only for their coloring, which is lovely, but mostly for their behavior.  You may find them calmly perched as above, but when they are active, they execute a most remarkable behavior.  They will fly up next to the road to an altitude of about 50 or 60 feet, hover for a few seconds, and then dive close to the ground.  They repeat this antic three or four times and then fly off.  They are among the least skittish birds, and often seem content to perch very near the road.  Image recorded at 14:00 MDT.

The image above is a Northen Harrier.  My initial estimate was that this might be a juvenile bird, but I have still a lot to learn.  Jack Skalicky, good friend and expert birder, adds the following: ‘It might be an adult female as most winter juvenile birds (2009 hatch year) would have a more rufous/orange in the chest, belly, flanks, and vent. This plumage is very bright. The streaking on this bird on a light background suggests an adult bird. I’m not sure of the molt timing in Northern Harriers but if they molt early in Utah this could easily be a first winter bird.’  Thanks Jack!  The image was recorded at about 14:40 MDT.

Copyright 2010 Peter F. Flynn. No usage permitted without prior written consent. All rights reserved.

It might be an adult female as most winter juvenile birds (2009 hatch
>>year) would have a more rufous/orange in the chest, belly, flanks, and
>>vent. This plumage is very bright. The streaking on this bird on a light
>>background suggests an adult bird. I'm not sure of the molt timing in
>>Northern Harriers but if they molt early in Utah this could easily be a
>>first winter bird.